Commissioner Victoria Bruce Issues Update on Tree Mitigation Vote and Path Forward for Winter Springs

Commissioner Victoria Bruce Issues Update on Tree Mitigation Vote and Path Forward for Winter Springs

WINTER SPRINGS, FL – July 2025

In response to public questions and ongoing discussions surrounding the tree mitigation fee tied to the Seahawk Cove Extension project, City Commissioner Victoria Bruce has released a detailed update to clarify the facts, address misinformation, and outline a proposed path forward for environmental planning in Winter Springs.

“This is not about politics,” said Bruce. “It’s about ensuring the City honors its own agreements, follows its legal procedures, and lives up to its commitment to transparency and sustainability.”

Background: Tree Mitigation and the 2017 Agreement

In 2017, the City of Winter Springs entered into a recorded development agreement and First Modification with the developer of the Town Center area, which includes the property now referred to as the Seahawk Cove Extension. That agreement identified the full project site as 45.687 acres and established a tree mitigation fee totaling $149,660, which was subsequently paid in full. The payment included:

  • $133,500 in mitigation credits
  • $5,000 for specimen tree removal
  • $11,160 in arbor permitting fees

This arbor fee was labeled in the agreement as the “final adjusted City arbor fee” for the Project, with “Project” defined as the entire development area—not a single phase.

June 23, 2025 Commission Vote

At the June 23 City Commission meeting, staff presented a proposed tree mitigation fee of $227,400 for the Seahawk Cove Extension. However, no reference was made to the 2017 agreement or the previous payment already made by the developer.

After reviewing the legal documents, Commissioner Bruce made a motion to clarify that the previously paid arbor fee applied to the entire project, including the area west of Michael Blake Boulevard. That motion passed in a 3–2 vote.

“I disclosed my meeting with the developer publicly on the record, and I brought forward a motion based solely on the documentation that had already been accepted by the City,” said Bruce. “Nothing was waived. The fee had already been paid.”

July 14 Meeting: Reconsideration Attempt

On July 14, a motion was brought forward to reconsider the June 23 vote. According to Robert’s Rules of Order, which the City of Winter Springs uses to guide parliamentary procedure, a motion to reconsider may only be made by a member who voted on the prevailing side—in this case, one of the three commissioners who voted “yes” on June 23.

The July 14 motion was made and seconded by commissioners who had voted “no,” rendering it procedurally invalid. The City Attorney paused the motion, advising that a motion to rescind would be required instead, and that it would carry a different legal standard.

During the discussion, Commissioner Mark Caruso disclosed that Mayor Kevin McCann had privately told him that it was City legal staff who “dropped the ball” in failing to bring the 2017 agreement into the initial June 23 discussion—contradicting public implications that the Commission acted improperly.

Clarifying the Project Location and Scope

The Seahawk Cove Extension project is located just west of Michael Blake Boulevard and north of State Road 434, within the City’s Town Center Development District. This area was always part of the broader 45.687-acre parcel defined in the development agreement.

“This is not an isolated site,” said Bruce. “It is part of a multi-phase, master-planned development, and the legal and financial obligations associated with that plan were intended to apply across the entire property—not just one section.”

Looking Ahead: Policy and Stewardship

Commissioner Bruce stated that beyond this specific vote, she sees an opportunity for the City to strengthen its environmental stewardship policies. At the July 14 meeting, she outlined two next steps:

  1. Engaging a certified arborist to advise the City on tree health, removal, and planting strategies.
  2. Using the arbor fund to purchase and conserve land, and to plant native tree species that support a “no net loss” tree policy for the City of Winter Springs.

“If we are going to maintain our designation as a Tree City USA, we need to lead with substance,” said Bruce. “That means not only protecting what we have, but building a future that’s environmentally and fiscally sustainable.”

Contact:

Victoria K. Bruce

City Commissioner, District 2

Winter Springs, Florida

www.VictoriaForWinterSprings.com

Investing in Leadership: IEMO Training and the Work of Local Government

Investing in Leadership: IEMO Training and the Work of Local Government

This summer, I had the opportunity to complete the Institute for Elected Municipal Officials (IEMO I), a professional development course offered through the Florida League of Cities in partnership with the John Scott Dailey Florida Institute of Government.

The program was created to help newly elected leaders like myself understand the full scope of municipal government. Over the course of 16 hours, we studied everything from budgeting and revenue structures to intergovernmental relationships and the roles and responsibilities of elected officials. It was an intensive and eye-opening experience, and one I believe should be required for anyone stepping into a public leadership role.

IEMO brings together elected leaders from across Florida in small class settings. That structure made it easy to ask questions, share ideas, and hear how other communities are navigating similar challenges. There was a clear focus on practical tools and real-life problem solving. From navigating council-manager dynamics to exploring how Florida cities are funded, every session helped me better understand the framework in which we serve.

“It was an awarding and educational experience to learn the ins and outs of government. Every elected official should be required to take this course.”

As someone who values transparency, accountability, and informed decision-making, this training aligned with the principles I bring to my work on the Commission. The more we understand how city government operates, the better we can represent our residents, manage limited resources, and make policy decisions that serve the long-term interests of our community.

IEMO I is also part of a broader program offered by the Florida League of Cities, which includes advanced courses and a multi-level Certificate Program for Elected Officials. I plan to continue my participation through that program so I can continue growing as a public servant.

Local government is often where the most impactful change happens. From safe drinking water to well-maintained parks to balanced growth and budget stewardship, it all starts here. I’m grateful to the Florida League of Cities for creating a thoughtful and effective training program and to the residents of Winter Springs for trusting me to represent you.

If you’d like to learn more about the IEMO program, visit flcities.com. If you have questions about what I learned or how it relates to our work in Winter Springs, I’m always happy to share.

Victoria K. Bruce

Commissioner, District 2

Winter Springs, Florida

Visit victoriaforwintersprings.com

Electric Bike Laws in Florida: Community Safety Concerns in Winter Springs

Electric Bike Laws in Florida: Community Safety Concerns in Winter Springs

Electric Bike Laws in Florida: What Winter Springs Needs to Know as Safety Concerns Grow

I’ve recently received a wave of feedback from concerned residents regarding the increasing use of electric bikes and golf carts by children and teens on our neighborhood streets.

These vehicles may seem like harmless recreational tools, but their power and speed have outpaced the policies that govern them. What we’re seeing is not only a matter of personal preference or mobility trends, but also a growing public safety issue that demands local attention. Understanding and applying electric bike laws in Florida is a necessary step in protecting everyone who uses our roads.

Residents Are Speaking Up—and With Good Reason

One longtime Tuscawilla resident described what many of you are witnessing firsthand: kids riding electric bikes at high speeds, sometimes carrying passengers, without helmets or adult supervision. Golf carts are now being driven to school and through retail centers by unlicensed minors. In some cases, children are operating electric bikes and scooters on public roads, swerving into traffic lanes and creating serious hazards.

These behaviors are becoming more frequent since school let out for summer. The risks are real, and the consequences could be severe if we do not act proactively.

Electric Bike Laws in Florida: What They Do and Don’t Cover

According to Florida Statutes, electric bikes fall into three classifications based on speed and power. Riders under 16 are not allowed to operate the highest-speed Class 3 models. Helmets are only required for those under 16, and no license is needed to operate most electric bikes or golf carts on local roads.

Key gaps in the law include:

  • No required safety training for minors
  • Limited enforcement of helmet or equipment use
  • Lack of regulation on child passengers or after-dark operation
  • No consistent oversight of where these vehicles are permitted

While electric bike laws in Florida provide a general framework, they were not designed for widespread, unsupervised use by children on residential and arterial roads.

Florida Statute 316.20655 – Electric Bicycle Regulations

  1. Rights and Duties: E-bike riders have the same rights and responsibilities as traditional bicycle riders under Florida law, including those in statute 316.2065.
  2. Local Control: Local governments (cities, counties) and state agencies can regulate where e-bikes are allowed — including on sidewalks, trails, beaches, and dunes — even if state law allows their use generally.
  3. Exemptions: E-bike operators are not required to have:
    • Insurance
    • A driver’s license
    • Vehicle registration or title
  4. Labeling Requirement (since Jan 1, 2021): Manufacturers must affix a label to each e-bike showing:
    • The class of the e-bike (Class 1, 2, or 3)
    • Top assisted speed
    • Motor wattage
  5. Modification Rule: You can’t alter the e-bike to increase its speed or performance unless the classification label is updated accordingly.
  6. Safety Standards: E-bikes must comply with U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission regulations (specifically 16 C.F.R. part 1512).
  7. Operation Requirements: The motor must shut off when:
    • You stop pedaling
    • You apply the brakes
  8. Where E-Bikes Can Ride: E-bikes can be used anywhere bicycles are allowed, including:
    • Roads and highways
    • Shoulders
    • Bike lanes
    • Multi-use paths

In essence, e-bikes are treated like regular bicycles under Florida law — with a few extra requirements and exceptions — but local governments can set stricter rules in certain areas.

Where Winter Springs Can Step In

Our City has the ability—and responsibility—to address safety concerns specific to our neighborhoods. Here are a few of the actions I’m working to advance:

  • Launch of public safety announcements through schools, social media, and HOA boards
  • Promotion of voluntary safety measures, including helmets, reflectors, and speed awareness
  • Police patrols in high-activity zones, such as Northern Way and Trotwood Boulevard
  • Exploration of local ordinances that limit speeds, restrict night use, and establish age minimums
  • Increased engagement with parents and guardians to encourage supervision and accountability

These steps are not about limiting freedom or fun. They are about creating safe conditions for responsible riding.

A Call for Prevention, Not Reaction

We do not want to wait for an accident or injury to take action. The rise of powerful electric rideables has created a safety gap that many cities, including ours, are now confronting. By strengthening community education and refining how we apply electric bike laws in Florida at the local level, we can better protect all who share our streets.

If you have feedback, ideas, or concerns, I invite you to reach out to my office. Your input helps shape our response and guide our policies.

Thank you for continuing to care deeply about the safety of our Winter Springs neighborhoods.

Victoria K. Bruce

Commissioner, District 2

Winter Springs, Florida

Visit victoriaforwintersprings.com

June 2025 Commission Meeting Recap: Public Safety, Smart Infrastructure, and Civic Engagement

June 2025 Commission Meeting Recap: Public Safety, Smart Infrastructure, and Civic Engagement

The Winter Springs City Commission met on Monday, June 9, 2025, to address vital local priorities, recognize outstanding community members, and continue advancing infrastructure and policy goals. As your District 2 Commissioner, I remain committed to promoting public trust, smart growth, and meaningful resident engagement. Below is a full recap of the meeting’s key developments.

Celebrating the Champions: Winter Springs High Girls’ Softball Team Honored by City Commission

The Commission proudly recognized the Winter Springs High School Girls’ Softball Team, recently crowned state champions after an incredible 24–8 season. This group of talented young athletes exemplifies perseverance, teamwork, and excellence—qualities that reflect the very best of our community.

Led by Coach Farrah Gordon, the team was honored during the meeting, with a formal city proclamation to follow. Their recognition served as a reminder of the importance of celebrating youth achievement and supporting our local schools.

Addressing Neighborhood Safety and Accessibility

Traffic Safety on West Panama Road

During public input, a resident requested permanent traffic-calming measures on West Panama Road, citing concerns for children’s safety. I fully support evaluating and implementing solutions that prioritize pedestrian and neighborhood safety.

Accessibility at Central Winds Park

Resident Leah Wiseman raised important concerns about handicap access at Central Winds Park, particularly during busy events. While some improvements have been made, additional curb cuts and ADA-compliant parking options were discussed. Ensuring equal access to our parks and public spaces remains a top priority.

Resident Advocacy for Transparency and Participation

Since launching my campaign for City Commission, I have consistently advocated for greater accessibility and transparency in how we govern. Prior to my election—and even in the early months of my term—Commission meetings frequently ran late into the evening, often past 11:00 p.m., and occasionally beyond midnight. That structure was not conducive to public participation or thoughtful decision-making.

Since then, we’ve made meaningful progress. Most meetings now conclude at a more reasonable hour, giving residents a real opportunity to follow proceedings live without staying up into the early morning. This is a shift toward accessibility that I believe strengthens trust.

Additionally, I firmly oppose any move to hold Commission meetings during the day, which would exclude many working residents and limit public accountability. Our community deserves leadership that meets them where they are—and at times they can attend.

During this meeting, several residents echoed those values by calling for even greater transparency, especially in how public dollars are managed and how decisions are communicated. I fully support their input and remain committed to continued progress on this front.

Development and Representation Updates

Sutton Crossings Project Moves Forward

The Commission approved the vacation of a public right-of-way to facilitate development of the Sutton Crossings project, which will include an ACE Hardware and Chick-fil-A. This is part of our broader goal of supporting responsible commercial growth while maintaining community character.

Redistricting Ordinance (First Reading)

A new Commission district map was introduced and advanced using Scenario 4. This version ensures near-equal population distribution across districts and complies with redistricting requirements. No current commissioners were moved out of their districts.

Strengthening Fiscal Transparency and Oversight

As part of our continued effort to manage city finances responsibly and transparently, I’ve pushed for clearer reporting and broader access to information. Specifically, I’m proud to share:

  • The City’s online checkbook—which previously only included expenses over $50,000—is being revised. Soon, all expenses of $2,500 and above will be visible online. This is a significant step forward in fiscal transparency, and I look forward to it going live soon.
  • I also strongly support City Manager Paul Diaz’s initiative to thoroughly review all expenses line by line during the upcoming budget process. I believe this kind of scrutiny is essential for ensuring prudent, prioritized spending that reflects the needs of our residents.

In addition, the Commission is working to standardize financial reporting by implementing:

  • Monthly trial balance updates
  • Quarterly fund balance statements
  • Pre-budget budget-to-actual reporting

These tools give both the Commission and the public a much clearer picture of how resources are being allocated and managed.

Progress on Stormwater and Water Infrastructure

Sediment Removal Work Begins

Starting the week of June 16, the City will begin sediment removal in key waterways to improve stormwater flow and reduce flood risk. This is a critical first step in our larger infrastructure strategy.

SCADA Infrastructure Upgrades Approved

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) approved the City’s proposal to apply SCADA system upgrades as “in-kind” work toward a state compliance requirement. This not only improves our water infrastructure but does so in a cost-efficient way.

Stormwater Workshop Scheduled

A dedicated Stormwater Infrastructure Workshop is planned for July. It will serve as a focused discussion on drainage, flood mitigation, and long-term capital improvements.

Board Appointments and Civic Engagement

Veterans Advisory Board Appointment

The Commission appointed Marguerite Orff to the Veterans Advisory Board. As both the mother and spouse of veterans, she brings a meaningful perspective that broadens the voice of the board to include military families.

Code Enforcement Board Continuity

I also advocated for Art Gallo to continue serving on the Code Enforcement Board, where he has made significant contributions since 2019. Art is a passionate advocate for water conservation, and I’d like to recognize his recent video feature on the St. Johns River Water Management District’s website, where he shares valuable insights on sustainable landscaping. His leadership extends beyond city service—his work is visible in his own yard and throughout the common areas of his HOA here in Winter Springs.

Improving Advisory Board Reporting

I again raised the importance of including regular summaries or meeting minutes from our advisory boards in Commission packets. This ensures we have a full view of citizen-led initiatives and maintain a two-way dialogue between appointed boards and elected leaders.

Meeting Summary: Key Takeaways

At a Glance:

  • Honored Winter Springs High Girls’ Softball Team for winning the state championship
  • Discussed resident-led requests for speed mitigation on West Panama Road
  • Addressed ongoing concerns about accessibility at Central Winds Park
  • Approved right-of-way vacation for Sutton Crossings development
  • Advanced new district map with minimal constituent disruption
  • Online expense checkbook expanded to include all expenses over $2,500
  • Supported detailed financial reviews in upcoming budget season
  • Creek sediment removal project begins June 16
  • SCADA water infrastructure project approved by DEP as compliance credit
  • Welcomed Marguerite Orff to Veterans Advisory Board
  • Reappointed Art Gallo to Code Enforcement Board, recognizing water advocacy
  • Scheduled stormwater infrastructure workshop for July
  • Continued push for advisory board accountability and reporting

Staying Involved

Local government works best when it remains transparent, inclusive, and grounded in the needs of our residents. I remain committed to ensuring every Winter Springs resident has a voice, and I will continue advocating for balanced growth, clean water, and public accountability.

Thank you for your continued trust and engagement.

Victoria K. Bruce

Commissioner, District 2

Winter Springs, Florida

Visit victoriaforwintersprings.com

Winter Springs West Side Debate 2024: Candidates Discuss Critical Issues Facing the Community

Winter Springs West Side Debate 2024: Candidates Discuss Critical Issues Facing the Community

The recent Winter Springs West Side Candidate Debate brought critical issues to the forefront, giving voters a clearer picture of how each candidate plans to shape the future of our community. With topics ranging from political unity and infrastructure to land development and the use of city funds, the debate shed light on the diverse approaches each candidate has to offer.

As a Winter Springs City Commissioner, I’ve always believed that transparency, honesty, and informed decision-making are essential to moving our city forward. With that in mind, I wanted to share a recap of the debate to help residents make informed choices about the future leadership of our city.

Political Unity & Future Challenges

Political unity was a central theme, especially given the divisions that have emerged over the past few years. Several candidates agreed that fostering collaboration and leadership across party lines is essential to tackling the key challenges Winter Springs faces—particularly the urgent need for infrastructure improvements and thoughtful long-term city planning.

  1. Paul Diaz stood out with his practical, action-oriented approach. He focused heavily on the need to unify the city by resolving critical infrastructure failures, particularly with the wastewater treatment plants. His argument was clear: unity comes from results, and the city cannot afford further delays on issues as urgent as wastewater management.
  2. Matt Benton reiterated the need to complete ongoing projects, though his response lacked clarity, leaving some voters unsure about his specific plans.
  3. Sarah Baker emphasized the importance of open communication and involving the community in decision-making to foster unity.
  4. Rob Elliot and Mark Caruso both agreed on the need to address immediate infrastructure concerns, though Elliot pointed out the restrictions posed by Sunshine Laws, which make it difficult for commissioners to collaborate outside public meetings.

Land Development & Conservation

Land development was another key issue, particularly the future of the old golf course property near the Highlands. There is broad agreement that any development must align with the character of the community while addressing concerns like traffic, flooding, and environmental impact.

  1. Most candidates favored maintaining the conservation easement on the golf course, with Paul Diazpointing out that 10 to 22 acres might be needed for wastewater plant development. Diaz urged a realistic, balanced approach to development that prioritizes the needs of residents and avoids unnecessary political maneuvering.
  2. Rob Elliot noted that alternative plans are being explored in case the city cannot acquire this land.
  3. Both Karen Meyer and Matt Benton supported a supermajority vote requirement to lift any conservation easements, ensuring that such decisions would only be made if absolutely necessary.
  4. Sarah Baker expressed her concerns about the environmental impact of development, stressing the importance of careful planning to prevent future flooding—an issue that many residents are all too familiar with.

As a sitting commissioner, I’ve been very vocal in my opposition to lifting conservation easements, and I was the first public official to take a stand against any effort to remove them. Our city’s natural spaces are invaluable, and any development decisions must be made with the long-term preservation of our environment in mind.

Stormwater & Water Infrastructure

The debate also tackled one of the most pressing issues: the city’s stormwater and water infrastructure. With aging systems and frequent flooding, candidates agreed that this is an issue that needs immediate attention.

  1. Paul Diaz passionately spoke about the need to modernize the city’s infrastructure, citing his personal experiences from past hurricanes as a driving force behind his commitment to resolving these issues. His clear, decisive approach to cutting through bureaucracy resonated with many in attendance.
  2. Rob Elliot and Mark Caruso also highlighted the urgency of addressing failing wastewater plants, noting that there is limited time to resolve these issues before the city faces potential consequences from state authorities. Elliot mentioned an ongoing stormwater study, but the slow pace of progress remains a concern for many residents.

Penny Tax & Resource Allocation

Finally, the debate addressed the question of how to fund these necessary improvements, particularly through the renewal of the penny sales tax. While most candidates supported renewing the tax to fund infrastructure projects, there was debate over how the funds have been managed in the past.

  1. Paul Diaz was critical of the mismanagement of penny tax funds, calling for greater transparency and accountability to ensure that taxpayer money is used for its intended purpose: infrastructure upgrades. He emphasized that the city needs a leadership reset to restore trust in how funds are handled.
  2. Matt Benton defended the city’s use of the penny tax, arguing that protocols had been followed. However, given the slow pace of progress on vital infrastructure, some voters remain skeptical.
  3. Sarah Baker echoed the need for better transparency, pointing out that residents are rightfully concerned when infrastructure funds are diverted to other projects, leaving critical issues unaddressed.

Looking Forward

The Winter Springs West Side Candidate Debate offered residents a chance to hear directly from those who seek to represent us, and it highlighted the urgent need for decisive leadership on infrastructure and conservation. While all the candidates brought valuable perspectives, Paul Diaz stood out for his practical, results-driven approach, emphasizing that unity and progress come from action. On the other hand, Matt Benton’s lack of clarity and Rob Elliot’s defense of past delays left some voters questioning their ability to address the city’s most pressing needs.

As a commissioner, my top priority has always been to balance economic growth with environmental preservation, ensuring that Winter Springs remains a thriving, beautiful community for years to come. This debate reaffirmed the importance of staying informed and engaged as we continue working together to address the challenges and opportunities ahead.

Together, we can ensure that Winter Springs’ future remains as bright as its past.

Winter Springs City Commission 2024: Fresh Voices vs. Incumbent Frustration

Winter Springs City Commission 2024: Fresh Voices vs. Incumbent Frustration

On September 19th, the Tuscawilla Homeowners Association hosted its annual “Meet the Candidate Night” at the Tuscawilla Country Club. Residents from across Winter Springs gathered to hear from the candidates running for City Commission Seats One, Three, and Five in the upcoming November elections. This year’s event stood out not only for the variety of ideas but for the frustration and defensiveness of some incumbents in the face of growing criticism.

The city of Winter Springs is divided into five districts, but all citizens vote for every commission seat. This event revealed the stark contrast between new voices calling for change and incumbents defending their records. Here’s what we learned.

Paul Diaz (District 1)

Paul Diaz, a seasoned tax accountant, represents a refreshing alternative to the incumbent, emphasizing new leadership and financial transparency. Diaz described a city bogged down by outdated infrastructure, especially stormwater and wastewater systems, and a lack of forward-thinking leadership. He criticized the status quo, stating that Winter Springs has delayed action for too long, and fresh ideas are necessary to move the city forward.

Quote: “We’ve kicked the can down the road long enough. Change is here. It’s up to you to decide if we need that change.”

Matt Benton (District 1, Incumbent)

Incumbent Matt Benton’s defensive and combative tone stood out throughout the evening. Benton, a long-time resident, and business owner, spent much of his time fending off criticism about the city’s financial health and infrastructure issues. He framed himself as someone who has been under attack both personally and politically, accusing his opponent of spreading misinformation. His frustration with the current political climate was palpable, yet he repeatedly claimed that Winter Springs is not financially broke and that the city is on the right track.

Quote: “I’m sorry if this stings, but my opponent looks at the city’s most recent audit and claims we’re broke. Winter Springs is far from being broke”​.

Benton’s frustration appeared to reflect a broader sentiment of incumbents feeling besieged by challengers who believe that the city’s leadership has failed to deliver on key issues like stormwater management, growth control, and infrastructure maintenance.

Sarah Baker (District 3)

Sarah Baker represents a fresh voice, advocating for transparent communication and accountability. She shared a personal story about her family’s experience with sewage overflow, which she framed as a symbol of the city’s deeper infrastructure problems. Baker believes that Winter Springs needs clear, effective leadership and a proactive approach to managing its budget and communicating with residents.

Quote: “I had over 12,000 gallons of raw sewage in my backyard. That made me realize how important it is to address infrastructure head-on”​.

Karen Meyer (District 3)

Karen Meyer has been deeply involved in the community for over five years, regularly attending commission meetings. She offered a practical approach to fixing the city’s problems, emphasizing the need for a professional city manager and solutions for traffic, sewer systems, and flooding. Meyer’s calm demeanor and experience reflect her understanding of the city’s issues, but she also pointed out how the lack of leadership in the city’s management has stalled progress.

Quote: “The City of Winter Springs is confronted with major issues. We need to attack the issues and not attack each other”​.

Brandon Morrissey (District 5)

Brandon Morrissey, a firefighter and EMT, painted a troubling picture of Winter Springs’ infrastructure, particularly its failing storm and wastewater systems. He was critical of the city’s allocation of resources, highlighting the wastefulness of spending on projects like pickleball courts while essential services like stormwater management remain inadequate. Morrissey represents a direct challenge to the current administration’s priorities, calling for safety and infrastructure improvements to take precedence.

Quote: “Our wastewater is failing, our storm infrastructure is failing, and we’re spending money on frivolous projects like pickleball. This is unacceptable”.

Rob Elliot (District 5, Incumbent)

Rob Elliot, the current District 5 Commissioner, focused on defending his record of leading infrastructure improvements, particularly related to potable water and wastewater issues. Elliot noted the city’s AAA bond rating and reassured residents that the city’s finances are stable. While Elliot presented himself as steady and experienced, his defense of the city’s status quo fell flat compared to the urgency voiced by challengers.

Quote: “Our potable water issue has been solved, and the city’s drinking water quality meets all state guidelines”.

Mark Caruso (District 5)

Mark Caruso’s law enforcement background played a central role in his presentation. Caruso described himself as someone who stands up to corruption and won’t be swayed by developers and special interests. His time as a whistleblower in law enforcement, along with his strong stance against political interference, resonates with voters who feel frustrated by the current state of local politics. He framed his candidacy as a fight for transparency and honesty, opposing those who use misinformation to maintain power.

Quote: “I retired as a law enforcement officer after serving the public. I’m here to fight for honesty in our city’s leadership and make sure we’re not influenced by developers and outside interests”​.

Why This Event Matters:

This year’s Meet the Candidate Night revealed significant tension between the incumbents, who are defending their records, and the challengers, who are pushing for urgent changes in how Winter Springs is governed. It’s clear that this election could reshape the future of the city, and every vote counts in deciding whether Winter Springs will maintain its current path or embrace new leadership.

For more information on the upcoming election and to learn about the candidates, visit https://www.voteseminole.gov/current-candidates

More Questions? Contact the City Clerk’s Office at 407-327-5999 or cityclerkdepartment@winterspringsfl.org.

Revitalizing Winter Springs: The East and West WWTF Upgrade Project

Revitalizing Winter Springs: The East and West WWTF Upgrade Project

Commissioner Victoria Colangelo shares exciting news about Winter Springs’ commitment to modernizing our city’s infrastructure. The City Commission’s approval on December 11, 2023, for the design and construction services of the East & West Wastewater Treatment Facilities marks a significant step forward. This project, more than just a design scope, includes detailed development, permitting assistance, and community outreach. It’s a proactive approach to ensuring reliable and efficient wastewater treatment, aligning with our city’s growth and regulatory compliance needs. This initiative underscores our dedication to building a resilient and sustainable future for Winter Springs.

A Wake-Up Call: Setting Time Limits for Commission Meetings

A Wake-Up Call: Setting Time Limits for Commission Meetings

One of the major pillars of my campaign was the promise to make City Commission meetings more efficient by not letting them run into the wee hours of the morning. However, shortly after my election in November, the Winter Springs City Commission repealed an ordinance setting a time limit for the end of meetings. 

On February 13, 2023, the commission voted to repeal the existing ordinance, which stated, “Time of adjournment. Reserved. Unless sooner adjourned by majority vote of the city commission, the mayor shall adjourn the commission meeting at 8:30 p.m…” and so forth. This repeal passed with a vote of 3-2; I voted against it.

The result? In just the last 30 days, we’ve had two meetings that ended after 1AM. The lack of a time limit is detrimental to both the commissioners and the public. It’s hard for anyone to make rational decisions or be fully engaged at that hour.

I firmly believe that we need to be conscious of how we use our time in meetings for the sake of efficiency and efficacy. The removal of time constraints runs counter to that principle. It’s time for a wake-up call, Winter Springs. Let’s put this issue back on the agenda and ensure that our meetings are both effective and respectful of everyone’s time.

Let Your Voice Be Heard

If you, too, believe that meetings should have a reasonable end time for the benefit of all involved, make your voice heard. Contact your commissioners, attend the next city meeting, or reach out on social media.

Let’s strive to create an environment that enables not just the commissioners but also the public to participate meaningfully in the democratic process.

Understanding the City Audit: What Every Winter Springs Resident Needs to Know

Understanding the City Audit: What Every Winter Springs Resident Needs to Know

Hello, Winter Springs residents!

Our city recently underwent another audit, and as part of my commitment to transparency and accountability, I want to help you make sense of the findings and what they mean for us all. Below, I’ve summarized the key issues and recommendations made in the audit.

Finding 1: Wastewater System Operations

Regulatory Violations: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has identified multiple violations at both of the City’s wastewater reclamation facilities, East WRF and West WRF. These range from unauthorized wastewater discharges to inoperable wastewater treatment systems.

Financial Implications: Violations have led to civil penalties that the City must either pay or invest in pollution prevention projects. As of June 2023, a total of $318,372 has been incurred in costs and penalties, which impacts the City’s financial standing.

Operational Challenges: The City has taken steps to correct some of these violations, but the continued occurrence of problems indicates systemic issues that need to be addressed. There’s also the potential risk of reputational damage and lawsuits.

City Recommendation: To comply with the audit’s recommendations, the City should work on immediate corrective actions to ensure that all FDEP rules are strictly followed. This could involve a detailed review of the contractor’s operational protocols, the condition of equipment, and compliance with federal and state regulations. Urgent training for the personnel may also be essential.

Finding 2: Water Utility Contract Monitoring

Monitoring and Oversight: The City’s delayed actions in contracting an independent engineering firm for auditing the water utility contractor’s performance might have contributed to the issues identified in Finding 1.

Operational Inefficiencies: The findings from the engineering firm’s delayed report highlight issues like ineffective communication protocols and outdated utility facilities that require attention.

Contractual and Regulatory Compliance: Without effective monitoring, the City cannot ensure that the contractor is in full compliance with the terms of the contract or state laws and rules.

City Recommendation: 

The City should establish robust policies and procedures for regular oversight of the contractor’s performance. Annual, if not more frequent, evaluations by an independent engineering firm should be made mandatory, as per the contract terms. The City should also facilitate a transparent and prompt communication system with the contractor to resolve any operational issues swiftly.

Finding 3: Infrastructure Sales Surtax

Overview:

The City received sales surtax collections for infrastructure projects but diverted these funds to projects that were not initially approved or discussed publicly. The lack of transparency and public discussion regarding project reallocations could erode public trust.

Key Points:

Reallocated Funds: City Commission approved the reallocation of $12.8 million from originally proposed projects to other ventures without individual discussion in publicly noticed meetings.

Unaccounted Funds: $2 million transferred from the Road Improvements Special Revenue Fund to the Water and Sewer Utility Fund did not have separate accounting, making it unclear if the funds were used for approved projects.

Public Trust: Changes in project lists and expenditure may not align with public expectations set at the time of the sales surtax referendum.

Transparency: Inclusion of significant sales surtax reallocations in the City Commission’s consent agenda reduced transparency and deprived the public of the opportunity for discussion.

City Recommendation:

Include items with significant financial impacts, like the infrastructure sales surtax, as discussion items in the agenda rather than consent agenda items.

Expend sales surtax collections in a manner consistent with public expectations.

Provide separate accounting for transferred sales surtax collections to other City funds.

Finding 4: Public Records Requests

Overview

According to the State’s Sunshine Law and City resolution, the City of Winter Springs is obligated to provide public records upon request, potentially charging a reasonable fee if the request demands extensive resources. However, the City’s practices are inconsistent with these requirements, as evidenced by an audit of 217 public records requests received between October 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022.

Key Points

Response Time: The City took an average of 29 business days to fulfill 38 requests, attributing the delays to factors like staff schedules and official City business. However, no standard time frame for request completion exists, and requestors were not notified of delays.

Cost Estimation: Six requests were priced between $21 and $3,895 based on estimated labor costs, but no record was kept to justify these estimates. As a result, the requesters did not proceed with payment.

Lack of Transparency: City personnel could not provide documentation to support how cost estimates were calculated. Additionally, no policies exist for tracking the actual time spent on fulfilling public records requests.

Risks

Public Trust: The City’s current practices could erode public trust and compromise transparency.

Legal Compliance: The lack of documentation and guidelines may result in non-compliance with State laws concerning public records.

City Recommendation:

Establish a standard time frame for fulfilling public records requests and notify requesters if delays are expected.

Require that documentation be maintained to justify the estimated and actual costs for fulfilling requests requiring extensive resources.

Finding 5: Procurement Policies and Practices

Overview

The City ordinances mandate that all purchases must adhere to uniform purchasing policies established by the City Manager. However, these uniform policies were not available during the audit period, and multiple instances of non-compliance with ordinances and transparency issues were noted.

Key Points

City Ordinance Requirements: City ordinances require uniform purchasing policies and procedures established by the City Manager. Purchases less than $50,000 can be authorized by the City Manager, while those above require City Commission approval.

Absence of Uniform Policies: Despite requests, City personnel failed to provide the auditors with written uniform purchasing policies as required by the City ordinance.

Discrepancies and Exemptions: There were instances where competitive processes were not followed, such as:

  • $67,339 spent on temporary labor services without competitive selection.
  • A $67,404 irrigation pump purchase made with three written quotes instead of sealed bids.
  • Contract negotiations for communication and branding services based on unspecified criteria not in the RFP.
  • A water system operator was selected without adhering to a competitive selection method involving a pricing component.

High Vendor Payments: From October 1, 2021, to September 30, 2022, the City made payments totaling $15.7 million to 59 vendors. Issues were found in purchases totaling $4.9 million from 14 vendors.

Transparency and Fairness: Due to the absence of defined policies, there were instances of unfair and non-transparent procurement processes.

City Recommendations:

Policy Formation: The City Manager should establish written uniform purchasing policies and procedures as mandated by the City ordinance.

Transparency and Compliance: The City should ensure that all purchases adhere to the new policies and procedures, ensuring that the procurement process is transparent and in accordance with City ordinances.

Competitive Selection: Incorporate a clearly defined process for competitive selection in the policies, which should include a pricing component when applicable.

Monitoring and Audit Trails: The new policies should include a mechanism for monitoring and auditing procurement activities for compliance and effectiveness.

Clarity on Exemptions and Definitions: Clearly define terms such as “professional services” and stipulate the criteria for exemptions from competitive processes.

Finding 6: Purchase Cards

Overview:

The City’s audit report on Purchase Cards (P-cards) reveals that while P-cards can serve as a convenient tool for making business-related purchases, they are vulnerable to fraud and misuse. The audit identifies the lack of comprehensive written policies and procedures that should govern the use of these cards. The report emphasizes the importance of internal controls to ensure accountability, especially given that $347,590 was spent through P-cards by 36 City employees between October 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022.

Key Points:

Lack of Comprehensive Policy: City personnel confirmed that there are no comprehensive P-card policies in place. The existing guidelines are limited to what is outlined in a cardholder agreement that each user must sign.

Basic Guidelines Exist but Are Insufficient: A cardholder agreement outlines fundamental aspects like the responsibility for the card, pre-approval of expenditures, and submission of receipts. However, these are not considered comprehensive policies.

Old City Commission Resolution: City personnel provided a City Commission resolution from 2004 that has elements of a P-card policy, but it is not adequate for current needs.

No Documented Supervisory Pre-Approval: Although the cardholder agreement mandates pre-approval of expenditures through managerial supervision, City records showed no evidence that any of the P-card expenditures were pre-approved. The process is verbal, and there is no written record.

Increased Risk of Fraud or Misuse: In the absence of effective controls and policies, there’s an increased risk that unauthorized or inappropriate expenditures could go undetected. The audit did not find any such expenditures, but the risk remains.

City Recommendations:

Establish Comprehensive Policies: The City should develop a comprehensive written policy that provides guidelines on all significant aspects of P-card usage. This should include, but not be limited to, acceptable uses, vendor types, single purchase limits, daily and monthly limits, and supervisory approval processes.

Document Pre-Approval: In line with the existing cardholder agreement, the City should document the required supervisory pre-approval for each P-card expenditure to reinforce accountability and transparency.

Periodic Reviews: To ensure compliance and detect any unauthorized or inappropriate usage promptly, the Finance Department should conduct periodic reviews of P-card transactions against the established policies.

Finding 7: Management Turnover

Overview:

Finding 7 highlights the challenges arising from significant turnover in key management positions in the City from April 2019 to February 2023. Frequent turnover, especially in critical roles like the City Manager and Finance Director, poses risks to the consistency and effectiveness of internal controls and policy application. The report notes negative workplace environment allegations and Commission interference as some of the factors contributing to the turnover. The issue has had cascading effects, leading to delays in financial audits and substantial unpaid invoices.

Key Points:

High Turnover in Key Positions: Roles such as the City Manager, Finance Director, Chief of Police, and Directors of Public Works and Community Development have seen multiple resignations over a relatively short period.

Negative Workplace Environment: Some personnel who resigned cited issues such as a hostile work environment and questioning of loyalty by Commissioners.

Commission Interference: Instances of Commission interference with City staff were noted. Training to prevent such interference is now part of the City Commissioners’ onboarding process.

Financial and Operational Consequences: The turnover has led to delays, including the incomplete fiscal year 2021-22 financial statement audit, and significant unpaid invoices totaling $1.2 million, affecting the City’s contractual obligations and finances.

Loss of Institutional Knowledge: The frequent changes in leadership have resulted in a loss of critical institutional knowledge, affecting the oversight, application of City policies, and possibly leading to control deficiencies and non-compliance.

City Recommendations:

City Commission Training: Continue and possibly intensify the training sessions for City Commissioners during their onboarding process, focusing on the importance of non-interference with City staff, as mandated by the City Charter.

Positive Work Environment: Develop and implement policies that actively foster a positive work environment. This could include initiatives aimed at employee well-being, transparent communication channels, and mechanisms for anonymous feedback.

Retention Strategies: Consider creating retention strategies for key management positions, such as competitive compensation packages, opportunities for career development, and offering exit interviews to understand the reasons behind resignations.

Audit Completion and Invoice Settlement: Prioritize the completion of pending audits and settlement of unpaid invoices. This may require interim staffing solutions or external assistance.

Policy Review: Conduct a thorough review of current internal controls and procedures to identify any gaps or inefficiencies that may have arisen due to the turnover. Implement changes as needed to ensure consistent policy application and effective operations.

What’s Next?

The City has been given recommendations on how to address these issues, and it’s crucial the city respond to ensure these changes are implemented for the betterment of our community. I’ll keep you updated on developments as they happen.

If you have any questions or want to discuss this further, feel free to reach out. Together, we can build a stronger, more transparent Winter Springs.


Best,

Victoria For Winter Springs

Older Posts